Appeals court hands Trump administration setback in push to block California votes by alleged noncitizens

A U.S. appeals court on Monday ruled against President Donald Trump's administration in a major voting dispute ahead of the midterm elections, denying a request to block California from counting mail ballots from people on a list of more than 20,000 registered voters the federal government alleges are likely noncitizens.

The 2-1 decision by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals marked the latest setback in Trump’s efforts to assert a greater federal role in overseeing elections in the run-up to the Nov. 3 midterms in which his fellow Republicans are fighting to retain control of Congress.

The majority decision said the Justice Department had failed to give a lower court judge an adequate opportunity to consider the case, and therefore it would be premature for the appeals court to weigh in. The lower court judge has scheduled a hearing on Tuesday in the case.

Circuit Judge Gabriel Sanchez, one of the two judges in the majority, wrote in a concurring opinion that the federal government “asks the federal court to dictate to a state legislature a matter squarely within the state’s traditional domain, upending the state’s policies in this regard and inviting disorder and confusion for voters and election officials alike.”

The lawsuit was an escalation in the Trump administration’s pressure on state election officials over alleged noncitizen voting and a rare intervention by the Justice Department in the voting process weeks before an election.

The California lawsuit was the first time the Trump administration sought to prevent a state from counting votes, though it did not indicate how many of the 20,000 people on its list had actually submitted a mail ballot.

Justice Department officials said Oct. 19 that the 20,000 people included 28 who had been criminally charged with illegally voting.

For Subscribers

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump says Alaska’s Democratic Senate candidate should be prosecuted over Dan Sullivan ballot dispute

FOR SUBSCRIBERSHow California prison reforms helped free a serial rapist called ‘America’s creepiest heir’

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump’s final campaign swing is taking on a darker tone

FOR SUBSCRIBERSMel Robbins has midterms advice for you

FOR SUBSCRIBERSFlorida cop charged with possessing dead man’s house had history of misconduct

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDHS hack exposes 40,000 employee names and undercover ICE agents, activists say

FOR SUBSCRIBERSRising diesel prices hit school districts hard ahead of the midterm elections

FOR SUBSCRIBERS‘There goes Texas’: The swing county that could determine the state’s next senator

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThey were deported to Costa Rica, but that won’t stop them from trying to come back to the U.S.

FOR SUBSCRIBERSIsrael’s election has no clear winner — but Benjamin Netanyahu looks far from defeated again

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDemocratic? Republican? Most new young voters register as neither

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDavid Crowley rushes to shore up support with Black voters in Wisconsin governor’s race

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDOJ’s ‘shocking’ flurry of pre-election activity breaks precedent, former officials say

FOR SUBSCRIBERSElectronic machines aren’t flipping votes, despite online claims, election officials say

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDemocratic candidates emphasize their support for gun rights in tight midterm races

Slide 1 of 1

California is the most populous state and a Democratic stronghold. It has more seats in the House of Representatives — 52 — than any other state. Democrats are seeking to regain control of the House from Trump’s fellow Republicans in the midterms.

Trump has made California a focal point of his sweeping immigration crackdown since returning to the White House, accusing it of undermining public safety through its “sanctuary state” policies that ‌limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.

Trump has long asserted that California’s immigration policies have facilitated voter fraud.

For Subscribers

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump says Alaska’s Democratic Senate candidate should be prosecuted over Dan Sullivan ballot dispute

FOR SUBSCRIBERSHow California prison reforms helped free a serial rapist called ‘America’s creepiest heir’

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump’s final campaign swing is taking on a darker tone

FOR SUBSCRIBERSMel Robbins has midterms advice for you

FOR SUBSCRIBERSFlorida cop charged with possessing dead man’s house had history of misconduct

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDHS hack exposes 40,000 employee names and undercover ICE agents, activists say

FOR SUBSCRIBERSRising diesel prices hit school districts hard ahead of the midterm elections

FOR SUBSCRIBERS‘There goes Texas’: The swing county that could determine the state’s next senator

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThey were deported to Costa Rica, but that won’t stop them from trying to come back to the U.S.

FOR SUBSCRIBERSIsrael’s election has no clear winner — but Benjamin Netanyahu looks far from defeated again

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDemocratic? Republican? Most new young voters register as neither

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDavid Crowley rushes to shore up support with Black voters in Wisconsin governor’s race

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDOJ’s ‘shocking’ flurry of pre-election activity breaks precedent, former officials say

FOR SUBSCRIBERSElectronic machines aren’t flipping votes, despite online claims, election officials say

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDemocratic candidates emphasize their support for gun rights in tight midterm races

Slide 1 of 1

All available evidence indicates that ineligible voting, including noncitizen voting, is exceedingly rare. A Reuters investigation published in July found just 129 cases in which noncitizens were federally charged with voting illegally; many appeared to stem from voter confusion or administrative errors, rather than intentional fraud.

The Justice Department filed its lawsuit on Oct. 15 in federal court in Los Angeles. The lawsuit asked a federal judge to order California to separate any ballots it received from people on the administration’s list from the rest of the ballots and not to count them until it had verified that the people who cast the ballots were citizens.

The Justice Department filed an emergency motion with the 9th Circuit to expedite the case.

California says the state’s safeguards against noncitizen voting are robust and asserted in a court filing that the Justice Department’s assertions relied on “suspect data.”

“At best, this litigation is a reckless political stunt,” lawyers for California Secretary of State Shirley Weber said in a court filing Tuesday. “At worst, it threatens to disenfranchise thousands of Californians this election.”

Voting rights activists have expressed concern that the Trump administration’s methods for scrutinizing state voter lists to identify noncitizens risk wrongly flagging naturalized U.S. citizens for removal from the rolls.

The Justice Department has told election officials in all 50 states that they could face criminal prosecution if they knowingly allowed noncitizens to remain on their rolls or cast ballots. It has sued 30 states and Washington, D.C., for refusing to provide complete voter rolls including voters’ sensitive personal data but has lost 26 of those cases so far without winning one.

“Today’s ruling is a positive development and a welcome speed bump to Trump’s disgusting attacks on the Constitution and our country’s democracy,” said California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat.