Groups sue to stop ICE from hiding locations of thousands of immigrant detainees

Groups that provide legal services to immigrants filed a lawsuit Wednesday seeking to stop the Trump administration’s new policy of hiding the locations of tens of thousands of detainees with final deportation orders.

The policy, adopted suddenly last month to expedite deportations, interferes with immigration lawyers’ rights by making it difficult, and sometimes impossible, to locate their clients, according to the lawsuit filed in federal court in Boston. It asks a judge to issue an order blocking the “unlawful and inhumane” change.

“No one should be denied a meaningful opportunity to defend their rights because the government has made it impossible for their lawyer to find them,” said Jacquelynne Bowman, executive director of Greater Boston Legal Services, one of the four groups listed as plaintiffs. “This arbitrary new administrative change leaves hundreds of thousands of people at risk of potentially life-altering consequences without essential legal help.”

The lawsuit challenges U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s decision, first reported by The Associated Press, to remove the locations of people facing final removal orders from its Online Detainee Locator System and to instruct staff not to reveal their whereabouts. As of last month, the move affected more than 16,000 of the nearly 69,000 detainees who were in ICE custody.

ICE and its parent agency, the Department of Homeland Security, didn’t immediately respond to a message seeking comment on the lawsuit.

The agencies have not publicly confirmed the change but have said they are prioritizing people with final removal orders for deportation. They have also said they are facing a “historic number of injunctions” from courts blocking their efforts. The agencies have denied that they are disappearing detainees, saying they remain free to make phone calls.

Since 2010, lawyers and family members have used the online system to track detainees as they get moved from facility to facility through ICE’s sprawling detention network.

For Subscribers

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump says Alaska’s Democratic Senate candidate should be prosecuted over Dan Sullivan ballot dispute

FOR SUBSCRIBERSHow California prison reforms helped free a serial rapist called ‘America’s creepiest heir’

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump’s final campaign swing is taking on a darker tone

FOR SUBSCRIBERSMel Robbins has midterms advice for you

FOR SUBSCRIBERSFlorida cop charged with possessing dead man’s house had history of misconduct

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDHS hack exposes 40,000 employee names and undercover ICE agents, activists say

FOR SUBSCRIBERSRising diesel prices hit school districts hard ahead of the midterm elections

FOR SUBSCRIBERS‘There goes Texas’: The swing county that could determine the state’s next senator

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThey were deported to Costa Rica, but that won’t stop them from trying to come back to the U.S.

FOR SUBSCRIBERSIsrael’s election has no clear winner — but Benjamin Netanyahu looks far from defeated again

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDemocratic? Republican? Most new young voters register as neither

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDavid Crowley rushes to shore up support with Black voters in Wisconsin governor’s race

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDOJ’s ‘shocking’ flurry of pre-election activity breaks precedent, former officials say

FOR SUBSCRIBERSElectronic machines aren’t flipping votes, despite online claims, election officials say

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDemocratic candidates emphasize their support for gun rights in tight midterm races

Slide 1 of 1

Approximately 1.4 million people living in the U.S. are subject to final orders of removal, which means an immigration judge has ruled they should be deported and the decision has been upheld on appeal or not appealed.

For Subscribers

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump says Alaska’s Democratic Senate candidate should be prosecuted over Dan Sullivan ballot dispute

FOR SUBSCRIBERSHow California prison reforms helped free a serial rapist called ‘America’s creepiest heir’

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump’s final campaign swing is taking on a darker tone

FOR SUBSCRIBERSMel Robbins has midterms advice for you

FOR SUBSCRIBERSFlorida cop charged with possessing dead man’s house had history of misconduct

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDHS hack exposes 40,000 employee names and undercover ICE agents, activists say

FOR SUBSCRIBERSRising diesel prices hit school districts hard ahead of the midterm elections

FOR SUBSCRIBERS‘There goes Texas’: The swing county that could determine the state’s next senator

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThey were deported to Costa Rica, but that won’t stop them from trying to come back to the U.S.

FOR SUBSCRIBERSIsrael’s election has no clear winner — but Benjamin Netanyahu looks far from defeated again

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDemocratic? Republican? Most new young voters register as neither

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDavid Crowley rushes to shore up support with Black voters in Wisconsin governor’s race

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDOJ’s ‘shocking’ flurry of pre-election activity breaks precedent, former officials say

FOR SUBSCRIBERSElectronic machines aren’t flipping votes, despite online claims, election officials say

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDemocratic candidates emphasize their support for gun rights in tight midterm races

Slide 1 of 1

Those individuals still have several options to challenge the conditions of their detention and looming deportations, including asking to reopen proceedings, seeking relief from removal to third countries and challenging violations of their rights. Federal judges have ruled thousands of times that detainees should be released or granted bond hearings.

Since the change went into effect, lawyers have been unable to find clients and potential clients and have spent “significantly more time” tracking down others, the lawsuit says. Calls to ICE, including to its Detention and Removal Information Line, “lead to long wait times on hold, sudden hang-ups, a general lack of information or no answer at all,” it says.

As a workaround, some lawyers have tried to find their clients through an ICE program that schedules legal calls, but only a small percentage of detention centers use it, the lawsuit says. The result has been delayed or missed legal filings and fewer cases taken, according to the organizations.

The lawsuit argues the change violates the Administrative Procedure Act because it was adopted without explanation and because of the First Amendment, which protects lawyers’ ability to advise people of their legal rights and seek prospective clients.