Court asked to dismiss eavesdropping case

This version of Wbna14940967 - Breaking News | NBC News Clone was adapted by NBC News Clone to help readers digest key facts more efficiently.

The Bush administration asked an appeals court Thursday to step in immediately and dismiss a lawsuit over the government's warrantless eavesdropping program, calling a lower judge's ruling dangerous and wrong.

The Bush administration asked an appeals court Thursday to step in immediately and dismiss a lawsuit over the government's warrantless eavesdropping program, calling a lower judge's ruling dangerous and wrong.

The Justice Department asked the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn the decision earlier this month by U.S. District Judge Garr King in Portland, Ore., that kept the suit alive. Government attorneys argued that continuing the case would risk the disclosure of "highly sensitive foreign intelligence information."

The lawsuit was filed by the Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, which had a chapter in Ashland, Ore., that went out of business after the U.S. government labeled it a terrorist organization.

Lawsuit specifics
The foundation alleged that two of its lawyers and at least one official were under electronic surveillance in March and April 2004. The foundation is asking King to rule the surveillance a violation of a federal law that requires a special court to approve intelligence-related wiretapping.

Typically, appeals are filed at the conclusion of a case in trial court; however, in this case, Justice Department attorneys are asking the 9th Circuit to step in now given the sensitivity and urgency of national security.

Lower court ruling
In the Sept. 7 order, King declined to dismiss the case, saying he believed there may be a way for the lawsuit filed by a now-defunct Islamic charity to proceed without releasing information that could harm the nation's security.

The decision, the latest of several rulings on the controversial program, drew a stern rebuke this week from Vice President Dick Cheney. He called it "just plain wrong."

In Thursday's filing, Justice Department attorneys argued that King's decision is flawed because classified facts needed to evaluate the case are protected under the so-called "state secrets" privilege.

×
AdBlock Detected!
Please disable it to support our content.

Related Articles

Donald Trump Presidency Updates - Politics and Government | NBC News Clone | Inflation Rates 2025 Analysis - Business and Economy | NBC News Clone | Latest Vaccine Developments - Health and Medicine | NBC News Clone | Ukraine Russia Conflict Updates - World News | NBC News Clone | Openai Chatgpt News - Technology and Innovation | NBC News Clone | 2024 Paris Games Highlights - Sports and Recreation | NBC News Clone | Extreme Weather Events - Weather and Climate | NBC News Clone | Hollywood Updates - Entertainment and Celebrity | NBC News Clone | Government Transparency - Investigations and Analysis | NBC News Clone | Community Stories - Local News and Communities | NBC News Clone