Judge Tosses Lawsuit Against Facebook Over Use of Minors' Photos

Catch up with NBC News Clone on today's hot topic: Judge Tosses Lawsuit Against Facebook Over Use Minors Photos N63831 - Technology and Innovation | NBC News Clone. Our editorial team reformatted this story for clarity and speed.

At issue was Facebook's use of minors' names and photos in targeted advertising in a case that highlighted privacy concerns.
A portrait of the Facebook logo in Ventura
U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg ruled that the minors gave their consent when they signed up for Facebook under a "statement of rights and responsibilities."© Eric Thayer / Reuters

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A California federal judge has dismissed a proposed class action lawsuit against Facebook Inc that had accused the company of misappropriating the names and likenesses of minors who use the social network.

At issue was Facebook's use of minors' names and photos in targeted advertising in a case that highlighted privacy concerns. The lawsuit, originally filed in Illinois in 2011, had sought to represent all minors that used Facebook and had their names used in an ad.

A portrait of the Facebook logo in Ventura
U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg ruled that the minors gave their consent when they signed up for Facebook under a "statement of rights and responsibilities."© Eric Thayer / Reuters

In a ruling on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg ruled that the minors gave their consent when they signed up for Facebook under a "statement of rights and responsibilities" that governs the site.

"We are pleased with the court's ruling affirming that Facebook's terms apply to all users and establish consent to publish their names and profile photos near related sponsored content," Sandeep Solanki, Facebook's associate general counsel, said in an emailed statement.

In court filings, Facebook had claimed that it only took information its users voluntarily shared with their Facebook friends and republished it to those same friends, sometimes with a related advertisement.

Plaintiffs had alleged that Facebook's "statement of rights and responsibilities" that governs use of the site was not enforceable because minors in California could not make contracts, but Seeborg disagreed.

"Plaintiffs have offered no facts or legal theories upon which they would be entitled to a declaration that the statements of rights and responsibilities are unenforceable," Seeborg said.

The case is: C.M.D. et al v Facebook Inc, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No 12-cv-1216.

— Reuters

×
AdBlock Detected!
Please disable it to support our content.

Related Articles

Donald Trump Presidency Updates - Politics and Government | NBC News Clone | Inflation Rates 2025 Analysis - Business and Economy | NBC News Clone | Latest Vaccine Developments - Health and Medicine | NBC News Clone | Ukraine Russia Conflict Updates - World News | NBC News Clone | Openai Chatgpt News - Technology and Innovation | NBC News Clone | 2024 Paris Games Highlights - Sports and Recreation | NBC News Clone | Extreme Weather Events - Weather and Climate | NBC News Clone | Hollywood Updates - Entertainment and Celebrity | NBC News Clone | Government Transparency - Investigations and Analysis | NBC News Clone | Community Stories - Local News and Communities | NBC News Clone