Pushing Trump's federal Jan. 6 case to 2026 would deny public a speedy trial, DOJ says

This version of Pushing Trumps Federal Jan 6 Case 2026 Deny Public Speedy Trial Doj Sa Rcna101056 - Politics and Government | NBC News Clone was adapted by NBC News Clone to help readers digest key facts more efficiently.

Special counsel Jack Smith knocked Donald Trump's request to delay his federal election interference trial for more than 2½ years.
Jack Smith in Washington on Aug. 1, 2023.
Jack Smith in Washington on Aug. 1.Al Drago / Bloomberg via Getty Images file

WASHINGTON — Delaying Donald Trump's federal trial for his efforts to stop the peaceful transfer of power until 2026 would "deny the public its right to a speedy trial," federal prosecutors for special counsel Jack Smith wrote in a court filing Monday.

"In service of a proposed trial date in 2026 that would deny the public its right to a speedy trial, the defendant cites inapposite statistics and cases, overstates the amount of new and non-duplicative discovery, and exaggerates the challenge of reviewing it effectively," Smith's team wrote, responding to Trump's request to delay the trial until April 2026.

The special counsel's office has proposed starting jury selection in the federal election interference case in December and beginning the trial in January.

Smith's team wrote that Trump's proposal is premised on the notion that lawyers will individually and manually review discovery material, which is not consistent with modern practices.

"The defendant’s proposed trial date, however, rests on the faulty assertion that it is necessary for a lawyer to conduct a page-by-page review of discovery for a defendant to receive a fair trial. But the defendant can, should, and apparently will adopt the benefits of electronic review to reduce the volume of material needed to be searched and manually reviewed," Smith's team wrote.

"In cases such as this one, the burden of reviewing discovery cannot be measured by page count alone, and comparisons to the height of the Washington Monument and the length of a Tolstoy novel are neither helpful nor insightful; in fact, comparisons such as those are a distraction from the issue at hand—which is determining what is required to prepare for trial," they wrote. "To accomplish that, the discovery should instead be measured by its relevance, organization, accessibility, searchability, and reviewability. Here, the Government has organized and produced materials in a manner designed to ease and expedite the defendant’s review and search, which allows for trial to proceed as the Government has proposed."

A hearing is set for next Monday, when U.S. District Judge Tonya Chutkan is expected to set a trial date.

×
AdBlock Detected!
Please disable it to support our content.

Related Articles

Donald Trump Presidency Updates - Politics and Government | NBC News Clone | Inflation Rates 2025 Analysis - Business and Economy | NBC News Clone | Latest Vaccine Developments - Health and Medicine | NBC News Clone | Ukraine Russia Conflict Updates - World News | NBC News Clone | Openai Chatgpt News - Technology and Innovation | NBC News Clone | 2024 Paris Games Highlights - Sports and Recreation | NBC News Clone | Extreme Weather Events - Weather and Climate | NBC News Clone | Hollywood Updates - Entertainment and Celebrity | NBC News Clone | Government Transparency - Investigations and Analysis | NBC News Clone | Community Stories - Local News and Communities | NBC News Clone