Jury set to deliberate in trial of longtime Trump ally Tom Barrack

Jurors are set to begin deliberations in the trial of a longtime friend of Donald Trump’s who is accused of cashing in on his access to the former president by acting as an unregistered lobbyist for the United Arab Emirates.

Attorneys presented their closing arguments Tuesday after six weeks of testimony from witnesses such as former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, as well as five days of Barrack’s testimony from the stand in his own defense.

Barrack, 75, is charged with acting as an unregistered foreign agent, obstruction of justice and making false statements to the FBI. Prosecutors allege he used his decades of friendship with Trump to “illegally provide” government officials from the UAE with access to — and information about — the president and top officials.

• Add to Google

Prosecutors allege Tom Barrack sought investments from United Arab Emirates while lobbying Trump

01:33

Prosecutors argued Tuesday that Barrack, who was chair of Trump's inaugural committee, "lied and he lied and he lied again" to federal agents to hide that he'd been offering political access and inside information to the UAE.

“Mr. Barrack traded his political access for a long-term relationship with top UAE officials,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Ryan Harris told jurors during his summation in federal court in Brooklyn, New York. “In return, the UAE unlocked its purse strings.”

The arrangement, Harris argued, paid off for Barrack. The UAE, through sovereign wealth funds it controlled, invested $374 million with Barrack’s company, Colony Capital, in 2017 and 2018, after not having invested “a penny in the years beforehand.”

Barrack repeatedly misled FBI agents who questioned him in 2019 about his dealings with a man prosecutors said was his go-between with UAE officials because he knew what he'd done was "wrong," Harris said.

For Subscribers

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAbdul El-Sayed tries to woo MAHA voters as Democrats seek inroads with RFK’s supporters

FOR SUBSCRIBERSGOP super PAC increases its spending for Sen. Jon Husted in tough Ohio race

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKratom-like substances are popping up in a typically benign supplement

FOR SUBSCRIBERSRecords reveal tumultuous marriage between killed New York Times executive and wife

FOR SUBSCRIBERSFrom clean energy warrior to ‘wall of shame,’ James Talarico reverses on a fossil fuel money pledge

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCongressional staff planned official trip with luxury stops in Italy and France weeks before election

FOR SUBSCRIBERSA harrowing ordeal aboard an Israel-bound plane

FOR SUBSCRIBERSOpenAI CEO Sam Altman to skip congressional hearing on rogue AI agents

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKey DOJ lawyers departed Trump ‘grand conspiracy’ probe amid pressure to produce, source says

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump’s new AI chatbot often links to a site launched under Clinton 26 years ago

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAt MAHA summit, industry CEOs the movement once vilified take the stage

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThis Paralympian has two goals: Win medals and give away $500,000 to her teammates

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCornell rape allegation spotlights stringent New York state laws that have long drawn criticism

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThe debate over AI’s future rages on both coasts

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDecades-old march dispute reignites in Northern Ireland, threatening political crisis

Barrack's attorney, Randall Jackson, countered that his client "didn't lie about anything" to the FBI and suggested that the agents' recollection of the interview was inaccurate — both elements of what Jackson said was a case filled with innuendo and "misdirection."

Jackson told jurors that the government’s claim of overwhelming evidence was “a joke” and that there was “nothing nefarious” about Barrack’s dealings with Emirati officials.

“It is perfectly normal in business for a company to both try to cater to your business interests as well as your political interests,” Jackson said.

Jackson noted that when Barrack was being considered for an ambassadorship during the Trump administration, he filled out a federal form disclosing contacts with foreign officials in 147 countries, including the UAE.

For Subscribers

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAbdul El-Sayed tries to woo MAHA voters as Democrats seek inroads with RFK’s supporters

FOR SUBSCRIBERSGOP super PAC increases its spending for Sen. Jon Husted in tough Ohio race

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKratom-like substances are popping up in a typically benign supplement

FOR SUBSCRIBERSRecords reveal tumultuous marriage between killed New York Times executive and wife

FOR SUBSCRIBERSFrom clean energy warrior to ‘wall of shame,’ James Talarico reverses on a fossil fuel money pledge

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCongressional staff planned official trip with luxury stops in Italy and France weeks before election

FOR SUBSCRIBERSA harrowing ordeal aboard an Israel-bound plane

FOR SUBSCRIBERSOpenAI CEO Sam Altman to skip congressional hearing on rogue AI agents

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKey DOJ lawyers departed Trump ‘grand conspiracy’ probe amid pressure to produce, source says

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump’s new AI chatbot often links to a site launched under Clinton 26 years ago

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAt MAHA summit, industry CEOs the movement once vilified take the stage

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThis Paralympian has two goals: Win medals and give away $500,000 to her teammates

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCornell rape allegation spotlights stringent New York state laws that have long drawn criticism

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThe debate over AI’s future rages on both coasts

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDecades-old march dispute reignites in Northern Ireland, threatening political crisis

Jackson also downplayed the UAE’s investments with Barrack’s company, calling it “less than one-half of 1% of Colony’s balance sheet” and saying it was on terms favorable to the UAE fund, not to Colony.

“This whole prosecution has been an act of misdirection,” Jackson said, adding that Barrack repeatedly blew off several requests from the Emiratis and supported Qatar within the Trump administration when the UAE and Saudi Arabia blockaded it.

Jackson further argued the government had no direct evidence that Barrack had struck a deal with the UAE.

Authorities say the alleged scheme started during the 2016 presidential campaign and continued throughout Trump's first year in office. The bulk of the government's case was built on emails and text messages obtained by investigators.

The messages showed Emirati officials giving feedback to Barrack about what he should say in TV interviews and providing input about what Trump should say about energy policy in a 2016 campaign speech. They also pressed Barrack for details about Trump's likely picks for high-level jobs, including CIA director and positions at the State and Defense departments.

Harris told the jury that prosecutors had showed them "hundreds of emails, text messages" and business and other records to prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Barrack and his assistant and co-defendant, Matthew Grimes, "acted at the direction of the UAE government."

Grimes' attorney, Abbe Lowell, disputed that his client was an unregistered foreign agent, saying he did what his boss Barrack told him to do, not what UAE officials requested. As for text messages showing a chummy relationship between Grimes and Rashid Al Malik, the alleged go-between, that was because "they were friends," not because he was under his "direction and control," Lowell said.

The jury is scheduled to begin its deliberations Wednesday.