N.Y. district attorney supports a 30-day delay in Donald Trump's hush money trial

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg said in a court filing Thursday that his office doesn't oppose Donald Trump's request to delay his hush money trial — only days before the former president was scheduled to face his first criminal trial while simultaneously running to return to the White House.

The surprise move comes after federal prosecutors began turning over tens of thousands of documents this month relating to their investigation and their prosecution in 2018 of former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen, who is expected to be a key witness in the trial.

Bragg's filing said that "although the People are prepared to proceed to trial on March 25, we do not oppose an adjournment in an abundance of caution and to ensure that defendant has sufficient time to review the new materials."

He added that his office doesn't oppose delaying the start of the trial for 30 days. The judge first scheduled the March 25 trial date in May.

If the start date is ultimately pushed back, it will be yet another win for Trump, whose strategy across the four criminal indictments he faces has been to seek delays.

In a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump accused the DA's office of having "illegally withheld thousands of pages of documents."

"[W]ow, people have never seen anything like this one," he wrote.

Trump had requested a 90-day delay in the trial after the U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan provided 73,000 pages of discovery since March 4. Bragg said his office’s initial review of those documents “were largely irrelevant to the subject matter of this case" except for 172 pages of witness statements.

He said the U.S. attorney's office produced about 31,000 pages of "additional records" to both prosecutors and Trump's lawyers Wednesday and "indicated that an additional production would follow by next week." A judge approved Trump’s request in mid-January to subpoena additional materials from federal prosecutors.

“The timing of the USAO’s productions is a result solely of defendant’s delay despite the People’s diligence,” Bragg said, noting his office had received a "subset" of materials from the U.S. attorney's office in June, and promptly turned what they had over to Trump's lawyers.

"Despite having access to those materials since June, defendant raised no concerns to the People about the sufficiency of our efforts to obtain materials from the USAO before last week; instead, defendant waited until January 18, 2024, to subpoena additional material," Bragg's filing said.

Trump's attorneys blamed Bragg for the delay.

For Subscribers

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAbdul El-Sayed tries to woo MAHA voters as Democrats seek inroads with RFK’s supporters

FOR SUBSCRIBERSGOP super PAC increases its spending for Sen. Jon Husted in tough Ohio race

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKratom-like substances are popping up in a typically benign supplement

FOR SUBSCRIBERSRecords reveal tumultuous marriage between killed New York Times executive and wife

FOR SUBSCRIBERSFrom clean energy warrior to ‘wall of shame,’ James Talarico reverses on a fossil fuel money pledge

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCongressional staff planned official trip with luxury stops in Italy and France weeks before election

FOR SUBSCRIBERSA harrowing ordeal aboard an Israel-bound plane

FOR SUBSCRIBERSOpenAI CEO Sam Altman to skip congressional hearing on rogue AI agents

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKey DOJ lawyers departed Trump ‘grand conspiracy’ probe amid pressure to produce, source says

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump’s new AI chatbot often links to a site launched under Clinton 26 years ago

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAt MAHA summit, industry CEOs the movement once vilified take the stage

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThis Paralympian has two goals: Win medals and give away $500,000 to her teammates

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCornell rape allegation spotlights stringent New York state laws that have long drawn criticism

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThe debate over AI’s future rages on both coasts

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDecades-old march dispute reignites in Northern Ireland, threatening political crisis

"The People should have obtained and produced these materials long ago, and instead they chose to seek unsuccessfully to obstruct our access to them," they told the judge in a March 8 filing that was made public Thursday.

For Subscribers

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAbdul El-Sayed tries to woo MAHA voters as Democrats seek inroads with RFK’s supporters

FOR SUBSCRIBERSGOP super PAC increases its spending for Sen. Jon Husted in tough Ohio race

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKratom-like substances are popping up in a typically benign supplement

FOR SUBSCRIBERSRecords reveal tumultuous marriage between killed New York Times executive and wife

FOR SUBSCRIBERSFrom clean energy warrior to ‘wall of shame,’ James Talarico reverses on a fossil fuel money pledge

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCongressional staff planned official trip with luxury stops in Italy and France weeks before election

FOR SUBSCRIBERSA harrowing ordeal aboard an Israel-bound plane

FOR SUBSCRIBERSOpenAI CEO Sam Altman to skip congressional hearing on rogue AI agents

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKey DOJ lawyers departed Trump ‘grand conspiracy’ probe amid pressure to produce, source says

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump’s new AI chatbot often links to a site launched under Clinton 26 years ago

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAt MAHA summit, industry CEOs the movement once vilified take the stage

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThis Paralympian has two goals: Win medals and give away $500,000 to her teammates

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCornell rape allegation spotlights stringent New York state laws that have long drawn criticism

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThe debate over AI’s future rages on both coasts

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDecades-old march dispute reignites in Northern Ireland, threatening political crisis

They've asked the judge to sanction the DA's office for not having gotten the material earlier, accusing prosecutors of "improper and unethical actions" and of having "engaged in widespread misconduct as part of a desperate effort to improve their position at the potential trial on the false and unsupported charges in the Indictment."

They also characterized the newly turned-over evidence as being far more relevant than the DA claimed, saying the documents include "exculpatory evidence" for their client and information that could be used to impeach Cohen's credibility.

The evidence relates to Cohen's 2018 guilty plea to numerous criminal charges, including making secret payments to women who claimed they had affairs with Trump, lying to Congress about his boss' business dealings with Russia and failing to report millions of dollars in income.

The secret payments to women are at the heart of the DA's case, which alleges Trump falsified business records related to Cohen's $130,000 payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels in the closing days of the 2016 presidential campaign. In court filings relating to Cohen's plea, federal prosecutors alleged Cohen paid the women off “in coordination with and at the direction of” Trump, who was named at the time only as "Individual-1."

Steven Cheung, a spokesperson for Trump, framed Bragg’s filing as “conceding serious discovery violations.”

“We will continue to fight to end this Hoax,” Cheung said in his statement.

In mid-February, Judge Juan Merchan, who is overseeing the case, scheduled the trial to begin March 25. He said he expected it would last about six weeks.

Merchan, who did not seem interested in defense requests for a delay during a scheduling hearing this year, will need to rule on both sides’ requests to push back the trial date. He could rule for a delay of less than 30 days or more.

Trump's attorneys said in a court filing last week that part of their defense will be that Trump "lacked the requisite intent to commit the conduct charged in the indictment." Trump faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to the hush money payments to Daniels. He has pleaded not guilty.