Judge signals he's likely to reject Trump bid to move hush-money case to federal venue

Prospects are dimming for former President Donald Trump in his effort to move a hush-money payments case from New York state court to a federal venue.

U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein indicated Tuesday in New York City that he was likely to rule against Trump's bid to relocate the criminal case to a federal courthouse.

Hellerstein repeatedly expressed skepticism of the argument put forth by Trump's attorney: that the 2017 hush-money-related claims he was indicted on this year were connected to his role as president.

"It is very clear that the act for which the president has been indicted does not relate to anything under the color of his office," Hellerstein told attorneys for Trump and the Manhattan district attorney's office at a hearing that lasted about 2½ hours.

Hellerstein said he would rule in the next two weeks.

Trump pleaded not guilty in state criminal court in April to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to his alleged role in hush money payments toward the end of his 2016 presidential campaign.

In court filings, prosecutors said Trump “repeatedly and fraudulently falsified New York business records to conceal criminal conduct that hid damaging information from the voting public during the 2016 presidential election.”

The conduct Trump is accused of covering up included a $130,000 payment his then-lawyer Michael Cohen made to adult film star Stormy Daniels in the closing days of the campaign to keep quiet about an alleged affair with Trump.

Cohen has said he made the payment at Trump’s direction, and Trump had acknowledged repaying Cohen through payments that were labeled as legal expenses. Trump has denied having had an affair with Daniels.

In their federal court filings, Trump’s lawyers contended their client hired Cohen to “handle his personal affairs” only because he had been elected president, so his actions relating to Cohen were “connected or associated” with his official duties.

Matthew Colangelo of the DA's office told the judge Tuesday that Trump’s argument about the payments’ having a tie-in to his presidential duties should be dismissed.

“By definition, writing personal checks, even if he is in the Oval Office, is not an official act,” Colangelo said at the hearing at federal courthouse in Manhattan.

Hellerstein seemed to agree with Colangelo, saying near the end of the hearing that it appeared "Michael Cohen was hired as a private matter by a public official for a private matter, to take care of private matters."

For Subscribers

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAbdul El-Sayed tries to woo MAHA voters as Democrats seek inroads with RFK’s supporters

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKratom-like substances are popping up in a typically benign supplement

FOR SUBSCRIBERSGOP super PAC increases its spending for Sen. Jon Husted in tough Ohio race

FOR SUBSCRIBERSRecords reveal tumultuous marriage between slain New York Times executive and wife

FOR SUBSCRIBERSFrom clean energy warrior to ‘wall of shame,’ James Talarico reverses on a fossil fuel money pledge

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCongressional staff planned official trip with luxury stops in Italy and France weeks before election

FOR SUBSCRIBERSA harrowing ordeal aboard an Israel-bound plane

FOR SUBSCRIBERSOpenAI CEO Sam Altman to skip congressional hearing on rogue AI agents

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKey DOJ lawyers departed Trump ‘grand conspiracy’ probe amid pressure to produce, source says

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump’s new AI chatbot often links to a site launched under Clinton 26 years ago

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAt MAHA summit, industry CEOs the movement once vilified take the stage

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThis Paralympian has two goals: Win medals and give away $500,000 to her teammates

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCornell rape allegation spotlights stringent New York state laws that have long drawn criticism

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThe debate over AI’s future rages on both coasts

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDecades-old march dispute reignites in Northern Ireland, threatening political crisis

Trump's lawyers argue that a change in jurisdiction to federal court — which could open up additional defenses to Trump — is necessary in part because the case is “politically motivated.”

For Subscribers

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAbdul El-Sayed tries to woo MAHA voters as Democrats seek inroads with RFK’s supporters

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKratom-like substances are popping up in a typically benign supplement

FOR SUBSCRIBERSGOP super PAC increases its spending for Sen. Jon Husted in tough Ohio race

FOR SUBSCRIBERSRecords reveal tumultuous marriage between slain New York Times executive and wife

FOR SUBSCRIBERSFrom clean energy warrior to ‘wall of shame,’ James Talarico reverses on a fossil fuel money pledge

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCongressional staff planned official trip with luxury stops in Italy and France weeks before election

FOR SUBSCRIBERSA harrowing ordeal aboard an Israel-bound plane

FOR SUBSCRIBERSOpenAI CEO Sam Altman to skip congressional hearing on rogue AI agents

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKey DOJ lawyers departed Trump ‘grand conspiracy’ probe amid pressure to produce, source says

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump’s new AI chatbot often links to a site launched under Clinton 26 years ago

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAt MAHA summit, industry CEOs the movement once vilified take the stage

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThis Paralympian has two goals: Win medals and give away $500,000 to her teammates

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCornell rape allegation spotlights stringent New York state laws that have long drawn criticism

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThe debate over AI’s future rages on both coasts

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDecades-old march dispute reignites in Northern Ireland, threatening political crisis

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's office "made the decision to wrongfully prosecute President Trump for lawful conduct that took place while the President was in office," Trump attorneys Todd Blanche and Susan Necheles argued in a filing ahead of Tuesday's hearing.

The DA's office has denied that characterization, saying Trump was charged in state court because he broke state law.

• Add to Google

Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg discusses charges against Trump

06:16

Prosecutors also knocked Trump's presidential immunity arguments in court filings.

"Nothing about this conduct touches, relates to, has a nexus or causal connection between, is associated with, or has any other connection to any official responsibility or authority of the President," one of the filings said.

They added that "no presidential duty or responsibility obligated defendant to have Cohen make the $130,000 payment to an adult film actress in October 2016, to agree to reimburse Cohen for that payment before his inauguration in January 2017, and then to make regular payments in 2017 to satisfy his pre-existing and pre-presidential debt."

Hellerstein, 89, is presiding over the dispute after both sides agreed they did not have an issue with him even though he did legal work for a Trump entity, Trump Equitable Fifth Avenue, in the 1990s while he was in private practice.

He was appointed to the bench in 1998 by President Bill Clinton.

The matter was originally assigned to U.S. District Judge Ronnie Abrams, but she recused herself because her husband, Greg Andres, investigated ties between the Trump 2016 campaign and Russia.

The district attorney's indictment of Trump was the first ever against a former president. Trump has since been charged in a separate federal case in Florida on 37 federal felony counts related to his alleged mishandling of classified documents, including willful retention of national defense information, making false statements and representations, and conspiracy to obstruct justice.

He pleaded not guilty in that case this month.