Attorneys respond to judge’s inquiry about whether a former Trump Org. executive lied at trial

An attorney for Donald Trump said in a filing Wednesday that a judge’s request for comment on whether an ex-Trump Organization executive lied on the stand during the former president’s civil fraud trial was “unprecedented, inappropriate and troubling.”

The filing — a response to New York state Judge Arthur Engoron’s request for comment on allegations that former Trump Organization Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg lied on the stand during Trump’s tax fraud trial — comes after The New York Times reported last week that Weisselberg was in negotiations to plead guilty to perjury.

"The Article simply does not provide any principled basis for the Court to reopen the record or question the veracity of Mr. Weisselberg’s testimony in this case," said attorney Clifford Robert, who appeared to be responding to Engoron's request on behalf of all defendants except Weisselberg and Jeffrey McConney, a former Trump Organization senior vice president. Lawyers for Weisselberg and McConney would file separately, Robert said in a footnote.

In a separate letter, Trump attorney Alina Habba said she has not spoken with the district attorney's office about "any of the matters discussed in the New York Times article."

"Further, in an abundance of caution, I have conferred with my ethics counsel and have been advised that I am constrained by my professional ethical obligations from providing any further detail," said Habba, who is serving as Weisselberg's civil counsel. "No adverse inference should be drawn from my inability to respond."

In a statement, Trump attorney Chris Kise said that "court decisions are supposed to be made based on the evidence at trial, not on media speculation."

Weisselberg's attorneys did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The other parties had not added further comment beyond their filings as of Wednesday night.

Lead prosecutor Kevin Wallace also responded to Engoron's request for comment, saying the state attorney general’s office is not directly involved in any negotiations between the Manhattan district attorney and Weisselberg about allegations he lied on the stand. Lawyers from the attorney general’s office have been cross-designated to work with the district attorney’s office, the letter said.

The attorney general's office argued in the nine-page letter to Engoron that developments regarding allegations that Weisselberg lied on the stand should not delay his decision.

For Subscribers

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAbdul El-Sayed tries to woo MAHA voters as Democrats seek inroads with RFK’s supporters

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKratom-like substances are popping up in a typically benign supplement

FOR SUBSCRIBERSGOP super PAC increases its spending for Sen. Jon Husted in tough Ohio race

FOR SUBSCRIBERSRecords reveal tumultuous marriage between slain New York Times executive and wife

FOR SUBSCRIBERSFrom clean energy warrior to ‘wall of shame,’ James Talarico reverses on a fossil fuel money pledge

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCongressional staff planned official trip with luxury stops in Italy and France weeks before election

FOR SUBSCRIBERSA harrowing ordeal aboard an Israel-bound plane

FOR SUBSCRIBERSOpenAI CEO Sam Altman to skip congressional hearing on rogue AI agents

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKey DOJ lawyers departed Trump ‘grand conspiracy’ probe amid pressure to produce, source says

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump’s new AI chatbot often links to a site launched under Clinton 26 years ago

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAt MAHA summit, industry CEOs the movement once vilified take the stage

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThis Paralympian has two goals: Win medals and give away $500,000 to her teammates

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCornell rape allegation spotlights stringent New York state laws that have long drawn criticism

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThe debate over AI’s future rages on both coasts

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDecades-old march dispute reignites in Northern Ireland, threatening political crisis

For Subscribers

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAbdul El-Sayed tries to woo MAHA voters as Democrats seek inroads with RFK’s supporters

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKratom-like substances are popping up in a typically benign supplement

FOR SUBSCRIBERSGOP super PAC increases its spending for Sen. Jon Husted in tough Ohio race

FOR SUBSCRIBERSRecords reveal tumultuous marriage between slain New York Times executive and wife

FOR SUBSCRIBERSFrom clean energy warrior to ‘wall of shame,’ James Talarico reverses on a fossil fuel money pledge

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCongressional staff planned official trip with luxury stops in Italy and France weeks before election

FOR SUBSCRIBERSA harrowing ordeal aboard an Israel-bound plane

FOR SUBSCRIBERSOpenAI CEO Sam Altman to skip congressional hearing on rogue AI agents

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKey DOJ lawyers departed Trump ‘grand conspiracy’ probe amid pressure to produce, source says

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump’s new AI chatbot often links to a site launched under Clinton 26 years ago

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAt MAHA summit, industry CEOs the movement once vilified take the stage

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThis Paralympian has two goals: Win medals and give away $500,000 to her teammates

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCornell rape allegation spotlights stringent New York state laws that have long drawn criticism

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThe debate over AI’s future rages on both coasts

FOR SUBSCRIBERSDecades-old march dispute reignites in Northern Ireland, threatening political crisis

Wallace added that the court had already found defendants liable and should impose necessary measures to prevent further fraud, including industry bars and the appointment of a monitor with robust oversight. Wallace also said that if the alleged perjury by Weisselberg proves to be expansive and calls into question the veracity of testimony from other witnesses and defendants, the court can revisit it later.

Engoron sent both sides in the case an email this week asking about Weisselberg's status after the Times reported that he was close to pleading guilty to having lied on the stand during his testimony.

“As the presiding magistrate, the trier of fact, and the judge of credibility, I of course want to know whether Mr. Weisselberg is now changing his tune, and whether he is admitting he lied under oath in my courtroom at trial,” Engoron wrote, asking both sides to report back to him by 5 p.m. ET Wednesday.

He said he was considering whether he should disregard all of Weisselberg's testimony in his verdict, which he is expected to issue in the coming days.

There is no jury, so ultimately it is up to Engoron to decide how he will consider Weisselberg’s testimony.

Weisselberg pleaded guilty to different charges in a related criminal case in 2022, when he and the Trump Organization were both charged by the Manhattan district attorney's office. In that case, Weisselberg admitted to tax fraud charges and was sentenced to five months in jail after he testified against the company. His testimony did not implicate Trump in wrongdoing, but two of his company's subsidiaries were convicted and hit with a $1.6 million penalty.

Among the $370 million in financial penalties Attorney General Letitia James is seeking to collect in the fraud case is $2 million in severance the company paid Weisselberg after he was released from jail.