Supreme Court Declines to Block Texas Voter ID Law

NBC News Clone summarizes the latest on: Supreme Court Declines Block Texas Voter Id Law N564946 - Breaking News | NBC News Clone. This article is rewritten and presented in a simplified tone for a better reader experience.

The U.S. Supreme Court is declining to block enforcement of the recently enacted Texas voter identification law.
Image: Super Tuesday, Texas Votes
Voters wait in line to cast their Super Tuesday ballots at a polling station located at the University Co-op in Austin, Texas on Tuesday, March 1, 2016. Tamir Kalifa / AP

The U.S. Supreme Court is declining to block enforcement of the recently enacted Texas voter identification law.

Passed in 2011 and subject to court challenges ever since, the law requires a photo ID to vote but limits the permissible forms of identification. College ID's, for example, are not accepted, but gun licenses are.

Related: Texas Voters Ask Supreme Court to Block Voter ID Law

A federal judge declared the law unconstitutional and found that more than 600,000 registered Texas voters did not have the kinds of ID's required by the new law. The judge said the law's burden would disproportionately affect Hispanics and African-Americans.

But an appeals court issued a stay, saying it wanted to review the law further, and blocked that ruling, allowing the law to go into effect. Challengers then asked the U.S. Supreme Court to lift the stay, which would have put the legal hold back into place.

On Friday, in an unsigned order, the Supreme Court denied that request. But it left the door open for the challengers to come back.

Related: Texas Sued Over Voter Registration Policies

"The Court recognizes the time constraints the parties confront in light of the scheduled elections in November, 2016. If, on or before July 20, 2016, the Court of Appeals has neither issued an opinion on the merits of the case nor issued an order vacating or modifying the current stay order, an aggrieved party may seek interim relief from this Court by filing an appropriate application.

"An aggrieved party may also seek interim relief if any change in circumstances before that date supports further arguments respecting the stay order," the court said in its brief order.

×
AdBlock Detected!
Please disable it to support our content.

Related Articles

Donald Trump Presidency Updates - Politics and Government | NBC News Clone | Inflation Rates 2025 Analysis - Business and Economy | NBC News Clone | Latest Vaccine Developments - Health and Medicine | NBC News Clone | Ukraine Russia Conflict Updates - World News | NBC News Clone | Openai Chatgpt News - Technology and Innovation | NBC News Clone | 2024 Paris Games Highlights - Sports and Recreation | NBC News Clone | Extreme Weather Events - Weather and Climate | NBC News Clone | Hollywood Updates - Entertainment and Celebrity | NBC News Clone | Government Transparency - Investigations and Analysis | NBC News Clone | Community Stories - Local News and Communities | NBC News Clone