What to know about the Trump trial today
- Former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker testified again today about his involvement in the hush money agreement with adult film actress Stormy Daniels.
- Pecker on Tuesday talked about the alleged "catch-and-kill" scheme to quash negative stories about Trump and make up negative stories about his opponents during the 2016 election campaign.
- Judge Juan Merchan could rule on whether Trump has violated a gag order in the case with his social media posts about witnesses.
- Trump faces 34 counts of falsifying business records related to the hush money payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels. He has pleaded not guilty and denied a relationship with Daniels.
- Here's what you missed from Day 6.
New hearing next Wednesday on alleged gag order violations
Court will be in session without the jury next Wednesday afternoon for a hearing on the alleged gag order violations raised by prosecutors this morning.
Trump addresses reporters, calls testimony 'amazing'
In brief remarks to reporters, Trump called the testimony "amazing" and today's proceedings "breathtaking." He reiterated his belief that this trial should not continue.
Trump also condemned Biden's messaging on pro-Palestinian campus protests.
Toward the end of this remarks, the former president addressed today's Supreme Court arguments on presidential immunity, saying that he hopes it was made clear that the president "has to have immunity."
Trial concludes for the day
The trial has concluded for the day. The cross-examination of Pecker will resume tomorrow.
Jury done is for the day
The jury has been sent home, allowing for the day to conclude with arguments over what is admissible by the defense on cross-examination.
Trump lawyer tries to make it seem like David Pecker has a bad memory
Bove seems to be trying to give the impression that Pecker doesn't remember things well by bringing up the exact dates of certain events and interviews.
Bove, for example, said that Pecker had a meeting with prosecutors on Aug. 2, 2018, but Pecker said he doesn't remember the exact date.
Bove drills down on timing of August 2015 meeting
Bove is highlighting imprecisions in Pecker's testimony regarding the timing of his August 2015 meeting at Trump Tower with Trump and his then-lawyer Cohen.
Pecker told the grand jury that the meeting took place the first week of August but has changed his testimony during this trial.
“What I recollect is that it was in the first half of August,” Pecker said.
When asked if it was "hard to remember exactly what happened almost 10 years ago" Pecker responded, “Yes.”
Bove appears to be using a tactic to persuade the jury to distrust Pecker’s memory “because it was a long time ago.”
Bove asks Pecker about his relationship with Cohen, outside of Trump
As Bove continues to cross-examine Pecker, he says that Cohen "wanted something for himself." Bove listed a number of things including "a paparazzi shoot for him and his daughter's rock climb."
"So you had an independent relationship with Michael Cohen?" Bove asked.
"Yes," Pecker answered.
Trump lawyer establishes prosecutors refreshed Pecker's recollection
Trump lawyer Emil Bove is now establishing that prosecutors refreshed David Pecker's recollection through a series of prep meetings, suggesting that they not only helped him understand what to expect at trial but also showed him documents to reconstruct his memory.
“You understood that you couldn’t say anything differently than what you said under oath previously?” Bove asked.
“What I said under oath was the truth,” Pecker said.
Bove gets Pecker to admit that AMI suppressed story about Rahm Emanuel
Under questioning from Bove, Pecker admitted that Hollywood agent Ari Emanuel wanted Pecker’s help suppressing a story about Rahm Emanuel having an affair in 2009, and received that help. Rahm Emanuel was President Barack Obama’s White House chief of staff from 2009 to 2010 before being elected Chicago’s mayor in 2011. He now serves as President Joe Biden's ambassador to Japan.
Pecker did it, Bove insinuated, because he was negotiating a deal with the private advisory firm Rahm Emanuel was working with.
Bove seems to want to showcase that Pecker had suppressed stories on behalf of two political candidates (Schwarzenegger and Emanuel) — and was not investigated by the FEC.
However, it’s important to note that those two candidates, unlike Trump, were candidates for state or municipal offices; the FEC would not have had jurisdiction, and federal campaign finance laws would have been inapplicable.
Pecker questioned about other stories he suppressed involving Tiger Woods and Mark Wahlberg
During cross-examination, Bove asks Pecker about other stories he was involved in suppressing, including one about Tiger Woods and another about Mark Wahlberg.
"Mark Wahlberg, he had an argument with his wife and the story was going to come out," Pecker said, adding, "We acquired the rights, I advised Wahlberg’s team we would acquire the rights and not publish it."
Bove asked, "You also purchased story related to Tiger Woods? Photographs?"
"It was a source agreement, so we did purchase it, yes," Pecker answered.